翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Ransom M. Callicott ・ Ransom My Heart ・ Ransom note effect ・ Ransom of King John II of France ・ Ransom Riggs ・ Ransom Room ・ Ransom School "Pagoda" ・ Ransom Seaborn ・ Ransom Stephens ・ Ransom strip ・ Ransom theory of atonement ・ Ransom Township ・ Ransom Township, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania ・ Ransom Township, Michigan ・ Ransom Township, Nobles County, Minnesota ・ Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A. ・ Ransom W. Dunham ・ Ransom Water Tower ・ Ransom Wilson ・ Ransom! ・ Ransom, Illinois ・ Ransom, Kansas ・ Ransom, Kentucky ・ Ransome ・ Ransome & Marles ・ Ransome & Marles F.C. ・ Ransome (surname) ・ Ransome Airlines ・ Ransome Gillett Holdridge ・ Ransome Judson Williams Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A. ''Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.'', 562 U.S. ___ (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the means test in Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The means test had been adopted by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, and ''Ransom'' is one of several cases in which the Supreme Court addressed provisions of that act. The means test determines how much disposable income debtors have to pay back their creditors, and permits debtors to shield some income from creditors for expenses based on cost tables prepared by the Internal Revenue Service. The Court ruled in ''Ransom'', primarily in reliance on supplemental commentary authored by the IRS, that a car-ownership cost allowance was available only to debtors who made loan or lease payments on a vehicle. This judgment resolved a circuit split regarding the allowance between the Ninth Circuit, which the Supreme Court affirmed in this case, and three other circuits that had all ruled the allowance applied even to debtors who owned their cars outright. The Court's opinion was delivered by Justice Elena Kagan, who was confirmed to the Court on August 7, 2010. The opinion was not only her first as a Supreme Court justice but also as a judge, and her participation in the case's oral argument, which was held on the first day of the Court's 2010 term, had also been her first. Justice Antonin Scalia, the sole dissenter, criticized the Court for using the supplemental commentary on the tables when the Bankruptcy Code only incorporated the tables but not the commentary. ==Background of the case== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.